Title: Unwanted Embyonic stem cells should be used for research and/or diseases cure.
The goal of this paper is for you to research a controversial topic, take a position, and justify your position in writing using appropriate supporting scientific evidence.
Choosing your topic:
Writing your paper:
Potential topics on which to write your paper
Embryonic stem cells
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.CriteriaLevel 55 pointsLevel 44 pointsLevel 33 pointsLevel 22 pointsCriterion ScoreIntroduction & Conclusion
Introduction states the main topic, gives an overview of the topic, describes why the topic is important. A position on the subject is clearly stated.
Conclusion summarizes the main points without repeating previous sentences; writer’s opinions are restated and are logical and well thought out.
Introduction states the main topic. The topic overview and importance is included, but some of the descriptions are vague. A position on the topic is not clearly stated.
Conclusion summarizes main points but is repetitive; writer’s opinions are restated.
Introduction does not state the main topic. The overview and importance of the topic includes a seemingly random collection of information that is either unclear or not related to the topic. A position on the topic is not stated.
Conclusion does not adequately summarize the main points; writer’s opinions are restated.
Introduction does not state the main topic. Topic overview and importance is not included. A position on the topic is not stated.
Conclusion does not summarize the main points; writer’s opinions are not restated.
/ 5Main points
Main points are well-developed with a high quality and quantity of supporting scientific evidence. Reveals high degree of critical thinking. Content indicates synthesis of ideas, in-depth analysis, and original thought and support for the topic. The opposing position on the topic and reasons why the writer does not agree with this position are described. All required content is included.
Main points are developed with a moderate quality and quantity of supporting scientific evidence. Critical thinking is weaved into some points. Content indicates original thinking and develops ideas with sufficient and firm scientific evidence. The opposing position on the topic and reasons why the writer does not agree with this position are described, but descriptions may be vague.
Main points are present with a limited quality and quantity of supporting scientific evidence. Critical thinking is limited. Content indicates thinking and reasoning applied with original thought on a few ideas. Either the opposing position on the topic or reasons why the writer does not agree with this position are missing. Some required content is absent.
Main points are present but are not supported with scientific evidence. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking. Shows some thinking and reasoning but most ideas are underdeveloped and unoriginal. Both the opposing position on the topic and reasons why the writer does not agree with this position are missing.
Logical, compelling progression of ideas in essay; clear structure which enhances and showcases the central idea or theme and moves the reader through the text. Organization flows smoothly. Effective, mature, graceful transitions exist throughout the essay.
Overall, the essay is logically developed. Progression of ideas in essay makes sense and moves the reader easily through the text. Transitions exist throughout and add to the essay’s coherence. Overall unity of ideas is present.
Progression of ideas in essay is awkward yet move the reader through the text without much confusion. The writer sometimes lunges ahead too quickly or spends too much time on details that do not matter. Transitions appear sporadically, but not equally throughout the essay.
Arrangement of essay is unclear and illogical. The writing lacks a clear sense of direction. Ideas, details, and/or events seem strung together in a loose or random fashion. There is no identifiable internal structure and readers have trouble following the writer’s thought process. Few forced transitions in the essay or no transitions are present.
/ 5Use of Sources
All source material is used and smoothly integrated into the text. All sources are accurately documented and in the desired format on the Literature Cited page. All sources are relevant and reliable.
Source material is used. All sources are accurately documented, but a few are not in the desired format on the Literature Cited page. Most sources are relevant and reliable.
Source material is used, but integration into the text is awkward. All sources are accurately documented, but many are not in the desired format on the Literature Cited page. Some sources are relevant and reliable.
Lacks sources and/or sources are not accurately documented. Incorrect format is used on the Literature Cited page. Sources are not relevant nor reliable.
/ 5Style, Mechanics, and Formatting
The writer treats the subject seriously using formal language. All sentences are complete, accurate, and clear; the writer controls the point of view appropriately. Sentence structure is correct throughout.
Essay is free of spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors.
Meets all formatting requirements: font, margins, and spacing are correct. Essay is neat and correctly assembled with professional look.
The writer uses some informal language and slang. Most sentences are complete, accurate, and clear. Sentence structure is generally correct. Some awkward sentences do appear.
Essay has few spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors allowing reader to follow ideas clearly.
Generally correct font, margins, and spacing but some errors are present. Essay is neat and correctly assembled.
Essay has many spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors, but reader can still progress through the essay.
Generally correct font, margins, and spacing but some errors are present. Essay is neat but may have some assembly errors.
The writer uses some informal language and slang. Work contains multiple incorrect sentence structures; many unclear or incomplete sentences.
Spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors create distraction, making reading difficult. Errors are frequent.
Fails to follow formatting requirements; font, margins, spacing, and neatness of essay need attention.
/ 5Rubric Total ScoreTotal/ 25
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more