Throughout this course you have been developing your skills in the area of action research. You have had the opportunity to reflect on the action research process and how it can support student populations in the field of education. You selected an action research topic that was of interest to you, either in your current or future professional setting, and had the chance to work collaboratively with your peers in discussing the action research process.
For this assignment you will be assuming the role of a peer reviewer. As you have read in the Instructor Guidance, a peer reviewer is an independent expert in the field who evaluates manuscripts for academic journals. When one becomes involved in the peer review process, it can be an incredibly informative experience. There are a myriad of reasons why one becomes a peer reviewer. First and foremost, this professional contribution to the field is an excellent item to include on your Curriculum Vitae often noted under the “service” section. Second, you have the opportunity to read and learn from others’ cutting edge work. Finally, by taking an objective and critical perspective reviewing others’ work, you can hone your own teaching and professional skills. Bridging this real-life experience with the theories of instruction in the virtual course environment, this assignment mirrors a career-building experience.
Using support from your assigned reading, the Instructor Guidance, and the discussions, submit the following for evaluation. Use the guidelines below to create your written assignment. If you have questions about the assignment or the rubric, please contact your Instructor using the Ask Your Instructor discussion board before the due date.
*Note: There are two parts to this assignment.
In your paper,
Part One:Using the rubric attached, analyze the research report you chose in the Week Two Action Research Selection discussion to include
Action Research Study Topic : Educational Standards
Title of Article
Mentored Learning to Teach According to Standards-Based Reform: A Critical Review.
Wang, J., & Odell, S. J. (2002). Mentored learning to teach according to standards-based reform: a critical review. Review of educational research, 72(3), 481-546.
Part Two: Narrative – Submit a separate document that includes the following elements:
The Peer Review Final Project
Next Steps: Review and Submit the Assignment
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more