Not all discrimination is prohibited by law. For example, employers routinely discriminate between potential employees based upon education or experience. Other types of discrimination are more subtle, but still legal. For example, some employers discriminate between potential employees based upon personal characteristics such as weight or attractiveness. Should employers be permitted to discriminate based upon attractiveness? Take a side and argue that an employer should or should not be permitted by law to discriminate against persons who are not attractive.
Guided Response: Respond to at least two of your fellow students’ posts in a substantive manner.
Agree or disagree with your classmate’s position. Defend your position by using information from the week’s readings or examples from current events.
Karens discussion reply:
Law should provide responsibility to the employers for discriminating employees under certain attractiveness. Ordinarily, attractive people always construct image within minds of the others. Employers always want those people who hold an attractive personality along with attractive look and most importantly comprise of attractive communication skill. These are necessary for expanding business. Only if a firm’s representative is attractive, his or her words would be listening minutely by consumers. There also exist many attractive people who can manage different types of complex situation just like the loan approval from bank quite easily (Seaquist, 2012).
Ultimately, those employers who are involved in business suggest that if there is enough motivation, for sure it would help in growing business. It is only the attractive employees who would make such things happen. Therefore, I do not believe that there is any harm in segregating employees based on attractiveness. Not all forms of discrimination can be forbidden by law. Like for example, employers routinely segregate amid the potential employees based upon educational qualification and the level of experience they hold. Irrespective of this ground, other forms of discrimination are more elusive but they are still considered legal (Seaquist, 2012). An example for this is, some employers segregate amid potential employees based on their personal characteristics such as weight or attractiveness.
Based on the discussion ground, I believe that employers should be allowed to categorize based on attractiveness. There exist some industries which are quite monetized based on attractiveness of the employees delivering service. If only they recruit people who hold some magnetic traits, it for sure would negatively throw impact on the profit base of the company. Like for example, modeling is a career choice, where an individual’s success is openly related to appearance
Seaquist, G. (2012). Business law for managers. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more