Assessment 2: Critical evaluation of epidemiological study designs Task: 1500 words (+10%) Word (or similar) digital document Academic essay (section headings are allowed) via Blackboard > Assessments > Assessment 2 folder. It is important for health care professionals to understand different epidemiological study designs and their associated strengths and weaknesses. The task for Assessment 2 is to undertake a critical evaluation of 3 major study designs (Cross sectional, Case-control and Cohort) with reference to sources of error and bias. The purpose of this assignment is to: Promote understanding of the unit materials; ! Develop critical appraisal skills; ! Develop written communication skills: university level academic essay ! Develop written communication skills: the use of correctly cited in-text and end-text !references using APA referencing conventions. !Method: ! Review unit materials, up to and including Module 8. ! Critically evaluate the 3 study designs with reference to sources of error and bias. ! Construct an academic essay. ! Students are expected to write in their own words (see information on Academic Writing and !Plagiarism below). ! Utilise APA 6th in-text and end text referencing technique. !Resources: ! Unit material: including module notes, tutorial tasks and unit textbooks. ! Other resources required: minimal or nil. !Tip: Use the Marking Key to guide your paper. It is a critical review, not a literature review. This means that you are criticising the different study designs, you need to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the epidemiological study designs. !Use APA referencing style. Marks will be deducted for incorrect or omitted referencing. Penalties apply for late submission. ! Assessment 2: Marking Key Essay Introduction: /2 Assignment purpose stated in third person Structure of paper explained Critical evaluation: /20 Consideration of key study characteristics (not simply a description of study design) Use of examples to support argument Demonstration of cohesive and integrated discussion Demonstration of critical thinking Essay Conclusion: /3 Purpose of the paper re-stated in past tense Contents of the paper summarized No new information presented Referencing, standard of presentation and academic writing /5 Mark /30 Note: poor quality academic writing and referencing will affect not only the marks for referencing and writing skill, but all areas of the assessment !
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more